Exact Results in Quantum Theory
2006/2007 | 2007/2008 | 2008/2009 | 2009/2010 | 2010/2011 | 2011/2012 | 2012/2013 | 2013/2014 | 2014/2015 | 2015/2016 | 2016/2017 | 2017/2018 | 2018/2019 | 2019/2020 | 2020/2021 | 2021/2022 | 2022/2023 | 2023/2024 | 2024/2025 | Strona własna seminarium
2024-11-15 (Piątek)
Gregory S. Adkins (Franklin & Marshall College, USA)
High Order Calculation of Energy Levels for Two-Body QED Bound Systems
Powerful methods have been developed recently for the exact evaluation of Feynman integrals. In this talk I will describe one set of methods that allows for the calculation of recoil corrections to the energy levels of two-body bound systems such as positronium and muonium. The results obtained at a given order in the fine structure constant are exact in the masses of the particles involved, and will be useful for comparison with the results of upcoming experiments. Room 1.40 and on zoom Zoom link: https://uw-edu-pl.zoom.us/j/2780321940
2024-11-08 (Piątek)
Vladimir Yerokhin (MPIK, Heidelberg, Germany)
Two-loop electron self-energy without expansion in binding field and Rydberg constant
The two-loop electron self-energy is one of the most problematic effects in the hydrogen Lamb shift, whose theory is the cornerstone for determination of the Rydberg constant [1]. Its contribution is presently obtained from combining the numerical all-order (in the nuclear binding field) calculations [2] and the calculations based on the expansion in the binding field [3,4]. The accuracy of the all-order calculations is limited by the convergence of the partial-wave expansion, whereas the accuracy of the expansion calculations is limited by the unknown higher-order contributions. Recently, methods with improved the partial-wave expansion convergence were developed for the one-loop self-energy problem [5,6]. I will discuss the recent developments in all-order two-loop calculations [7] and their consequences for the determination of the Rydberg constant. [1] E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell, and B. N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025010 (2021). [2] V. A. Yerokhin, Phys. Rev. A 80, 040501(R) (2009). [3] K. Pachucki and U. D. Jentschura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 113005 (2003). [4] S. G. Karshenboim, A. Ozawa, and V. G. Ivanov, Phys. Rev. A 100, 032515 (2019). [5] V. A. Yerokhin, K. Pachucki, and V. M. Shabaev, Phys. Rev. A 72, 042502 (2005). [6] J. Sapirstein, K. T. Cheng, Phys. Rev. A 108, 042804 (2023). [7] V. A. Yerokhin, Z. Harman, Ch. Keitel, submitted.
2024-10-11 (Piątek)
Krzysztof Jodłowski (IBS, Daejeon, Republic of Korea)
Covariant quantum field theory of tachyons is unphysical
Tachyons have fascinated generations of physicists due to their peculiar behavior, but they did not solve any real physical problem. This changed with the recent work of Dragan and Ekert, who have shown that superluminal observers may be related to the foundations of quantum mechanics (QM), since they require introducing non-determinism and wave-like behavior at the fundamental level. In fact, both classical and quantum field theory of tachyons have been constructed. Unfortunately, we will show that the latter theory contains several flaws, mostly caused by adapting incorrect results due to other authors, which puts the aforementioned program in question. In particular, unlike Feinberg, we show that tachyon microcausality violation spoils fundamental features of QFT such as statistical independence of distant measurements, and it negatively affects constructing Lorentz invariant scattering theory of tachyons. Moreover, the Feynman propagator, which was adapted from Dhar and Sudarshan, is shown to violate unitarity, the tachyonic vacuum is unstable due to radiatively generated tachyon self-interactions, and an interpolating tachyon field likely does not satisfy the LSZ asymptotic condition. Our analysis indicates that a covariant QFT of tachyons seems impossible, hence superluminal observers are unphysical and cannot be used to derive QM.
2024-10-04 (Piątek)
Jan Dereziński (KMMF FUW)
Lamb shift as a problem in mathematical physics
I will try to formulate the problem of bound states as a rigorous problem in (perturbative) QED. These proposals are based on my conversations with prof. Pachucki and Shabaev. I will also tell some entertaining anecdotes related to this question.